depracted apiversion for kubernetes 1.21 #49
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello @hiddeco
is it okay to upgrade apiversions for clusterrole and clusterrolebinding due to kubernetes version upgrade.
The rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1beta1 API version of ClusterRole, ClusterRoleBinding, Role, and RoleBinding is no longer served as of v1.22.
Migrate manifests and API clients to use the rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1 API version, available since v1.8.
All existing persisted objects are accessible via the new APIs
No notable changes
https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/using-api/deprecation-guide/
I think there is no harm for anyone if we change the apiversions since
"Migrate manifests and API clients to use the scheduling.k8s.io/v1 API version, available since v1.14."
what do you think?