Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue 18016: Add infos count to oc status #18422

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 5, 2018

Conversation

damemi
Copy link

@damemi damemi commented Feb 2, 2018

Fix for #18016

Now oc status without -v will show a count for number of errors, warnings, and info identified. Also refactored this output to reduce redundant switch statements with including infos.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 2, 2018
@damemi
Copy link
Author

damemi commented Feb 5, 2018

/assign @enj

@damemi damemi changed the title Add infos count to oc status Issue 18016: Add infos count to oc status Feb 5, 2018
fmt.Fprintf(out, "%s identified, use '%[2]s status -v' to see details.\n", warnings, d.CommandBaseName)
switch {
case !d.Suggest && ((len(errorMarkers) > 0 && errorSuggestions > 0) || len(warningMarkers) > 0 || len(infoMarkers) > 0):
fmt.Fprintf(out, "%s identified, use '%s status -v' to see details.\n", markerString, d.CommandBaseName)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see where the count for each of these is printed.

EDIT: nevermind, see it now. Mind having a separate branch for a single info above?

if len(infoMarkers) == 1 {
    ...
} else if len(infoMarkers) > 1 

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, I wasn't sure if it grammatically made more sense to have, eg, "2 infos identified" vs "2 info identified"

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated

Now `oc status` without `-v` will show a count for number of errors, warnings, and info identified. Also refactored this output to reduce redundant switch statements with including infos.
@damemi
Copy link
Author

damemi commented Feb 5, 2018

/retest

@juanvallejo
Copy link
Contributor

Changes look good to me
Tagging @soltysh for approval

Copy link
Member

@soltysh soltysh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 5, 2018
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: damemi, soltysh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these OWNERS Files:

You can indicate your approval by writing /approve in a comment
You can cancel your approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 5, 2018
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Automatic merge from submit-queue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants